Howdy,
A month or so back, I received a query from an online
organization who promotes musical artists, mostly jazz,
and who asked to receive feedback as to what was wrong
with Smooth Jazz Radio and causing it's rapid demise in
many cities. I have long had my thoughts on this, partly
because many of those stations used to play my music
too, and I've seen the changes from the perspective of
someone who understands the inner workings or radio
better than the average listener.
I soon heard that the organization I wrote to had
received hundreds of passionate responses and so I
assumed my letter was lost in the pile until yesterday,
when I began receiving emails from people who'd just
read it; mostly folks in the music bidnis who were
disheartened and frustrated about what had happened to
their favorite format of radio over the years. They
seemed to strongly relate to my letter and wanted me to
know that they shared my feelings.
Though my letter was mostly about Smooth Jazz formats,
it really is about nearly every format of radio station
out there. They are all threatened and frantically
searching for a way to succeed as they once did. They
seem to try everything but playing intelligent, heart
felt music.
Because so many folks have been writing me about my
letter, I decided to post it on my homepage. Maybe it
will matter in some way that I cannot yet see. Thank you
for reading.
~Michael |
Because I'm an artist once played
on Smooth Jazz radio, I'm sure that my thoughts on this
format, and what has become of it, will be in some ways
biased. But because I'm also a lover of popular music
and have loved the periods in life when radio has served
the public, I think I also may have some viewpoints
shared by many people.
In the 1980s there were a group of stations around the
country playing a wide variety of melodic music. They
mixed artists as diverse as Sting, Sade, Andreas
Vollenweider, Shawn Colvin, James Taylor, Michael
Franks, Pat Metheny, The Rippingtons, Basia, Simply Red,
'til Tuesday, Bruce Hornsby and many others. All of
these stations did not call themselves the same thing,
some were New Adult Contemporary, others were
Progressive Adult Contemporary, others were Eclectic
Oriented Radio.
Because my first album came out during this time, I
received play at hundreds of stations and formed
friendly relationships with many station owners and
managers and music/program directors. It was a rare time
where the people in the communities served by these
stations actually related to and were loyal and grateful
to the people broadcasting music that touched their
lives and entertained and uplifted them.
I
was there, I walked into stations in Baltimore and
Washington, DC and Portland, Maine and Orlando and Miami
and Tampa and San Antonio and Denver and Minneapolis and
San Francisco and LA and San Diego and Seattle and
Portland and Anchorage and Fairbanks. I saw the
relationship between listeners and programmers and it
was rare and beautiful. I would hear from the people in
my audiences of their loyalty to these stations. Like
highschool kids in small towns often do, when they have
a local station that supports their school and teams,
these were adults in their 20s and 30s and 40s who felt
that they had a radio station of their own who cared
what they played on the air and who brought something of
value to their community.
Then came consultants, usually from outside the area,
who promised these stations they could be more popular
if they followed a more narrow format. They started
calling themselves Smooth Jazz and I watched station
after station begin to narrow their format, dropping
Shawn Colvin and Joni Mitchell in favor of more and more
songs with sax, more and more songs with a very
definable pop/jazz sound. When I heard that one large
consultant had dropped Michael Franks from Smooth Jazz
formats, I knew they'd gone insane.
In the cities where I performed I instantly saw a
downturn in the number of people coming to concerts.
Club and theater owners complained, audience members
complained. People would ask me, "what has happened to
the radio?" as if I had some inside track. It felt to me
like station after station was following like lemmings,
narrowing their format to a few predictable songs and
styles, literally to the point that real jazz musicians,
as much as they loved the exposure, were embarrassed to
be considered a Smooth Jazz Artist.
We used to joke that the surest way in the entire
country to get on any format of radio was to send an
instrumental version of a famous hit to Smooth Jazz
Radio, where they'd have it on the air the next day.
Around
the US and in Seattle in particular, I know lots of
Deejays and music directors. Most of them have grown to
hate the music they are forced to play. It might be okay
if it wasn't force fed the public. But the steady
narrowing of the format, so as to fit into a tight
genre, has caused boredom among the few listeners left.
I cannot remember in the last ten years one person
telling me that they have a station they love other than
National Public Radio. Every other station is as bland
as the next.
What Smooth Jazz needs to do is to open itself up to
other influences, much like they do in Europe and Japan
with what they call West Coast music. Go for a feel more
than specific instrumentation or groove. A station could
keep playing jazzy artists, but also embrace other
styles of music that feels good and warm and uplifting.
Don't be afraid to stretch, to step over the imaginary
boundary of what is smooth and what is not. Certainly,
radio stepped over the line of what is jazz and what is
not a very long time ago. Bring back some occasional
real jazz, bring some of the sophisticated songs of Joni
Mitchell's recent recordings and James Taylor's. There
are hundreds of new vocalists who have a very graceful
delivery and would mesh beautifully with the songs
already played.
More than anything, ask your local audience - if you
still have one. Ask them what is the worst thing about
your station and the best. Ask what ten artists they'd
love to hear that they don't. Ask if they ever heard a
song that didn't fit tightly into Smooth Jazz, would
they turn the channel? And while you're at it, ask them
who you play too often. Then ignore the national
consultants who sit three thousand miles away and tell
you things you don't believe or don't want to do.
There was a time when the folks who worked in radio
truly did something wonderful. They offered music to the
world, they tried to pick good songs and interesting
recordings and they heard back from the public and knew
whether to play more of it or not. These days stations
don't really want you to call. Give it a try some time
and see if you can get anyone to answer a phone. And
often, they don't even want you to have the email
address of the DJs. They want you to send your emails
addressed to "studio@..." That is no way to build
listener loyalty. You build listener loyalty by giving
listeners something with heart and soul every single
day.
The
demise of Smooth Jazz is not a surprise. It was
inevitable. Because the name itself became a box and
sucked up all variation in creativity. Artists found
themselves trying to record more songs that would fit
the narrow format - and it's understandable. How else
can they keep going, feeding their families and staying
alive in the business? But that is no way to create
music; working within the confines of a format that
squeezes smaller and smaller and reaches less and less
people every day. As with anything else in life you're
doing that no longer serves, take a deep breath and find
a new way to begin again. Get honest and real and don't
be afraid to really work at it. The music is out there
in great abundance, the people are certainly there;
nearly forgotten and long neglected. If you're in Smooth
Jazz radio you can do something about it. Stop thinking
in terms of demographics and think once again in terms
of service to human beings; that's what radio is
supposed to be, you know. You're using public airwaves
and you're supposed to be giving something back that
matters. Take another look and see what you can do to
create goodwill and enjoyment in this world by sharing
music that can make people's lives better. Who dares to
try this is going to find a lot of grateful people
swarming to your station. I'll be one of them.
~Michael Tomlinson
March, 2008
mt@michaeltomlinson.com |
|